Information for healthcare professionals

EN
ULTOMIRIS, concentrate for solution for infusion

ULTOMIRIS 300 mg/30 ML, concentrate for solution for infusion

ULTOMIRIS 300 MG/3 ML, CONCENTRATE FOR SOLUTION FOR INFUSION

ULTOMIRIS 1100 MG/11 ML, CONCENTRATE FOR SOLUTION FOR INFUSION

Composition

Active substances

Ravulizumab, produced from genetically modified ovarian cells from the Chinese hamster.

Excipients

Sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate

Disodium phosphate heptahydrate

Ultomiris 300 mg/mL and 1100 mg/11 mL: L-arginine

Ultomiris 300 mg/mL and 1100 mg/11 mL: sucrose

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL: sodium chloride

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL: 115 mg sodium per 30 mL vial

Ultomiris 300 mg/mL: 4.mg sodium per mL vial

Ultomiris 1100 mg/11 mL: 16.mg sodium per 11 mL vial

Polysorbate 80

Water for injection

Pharmaceutical form and active substance quantity per unit

Concentrate for solution for infusion.

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL:

Clear to translucent, slightly whitish solution, pH 7.0.

One 30 mL vial contains 300 mg of ravulizumab (10 mg/mL) and 115 mg of sodium.

After dilution, the final concentration of the solution to be infused is mg/mL.

Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL:

Translucent, clear to yellowish solution, pH 7.4.

One mL vial contains 300 mg of ravulizumab (100 mg/mL) and 4.mg of sodium.

After dilution, the final concentration of the solution to be infused is 50 mg/mL.

Ultomiris 1100 mg/11 mL:

Translucent, clear to yellowish solution, pH 7.4.

One 11 mL vial contains 1100 mg of ravulizumab (100 mg/mL) and 16.mg of sodium.

After dilution, the final concentration of the solution to be infused is 50 mg/mL.

Indications/Uses

Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH)

Ultomiris is used in the treatment of adult and paediatric patients with a body weight of 10 kg or above with PNH:

- in patients with haemolysis with one or more clinical symptom(s) indicative of high disease activity,

- in patients who are clinically stable after having been treated with eculizumab for at least the past months.

Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)

Ultomiris is used in the treatment of adult and paediatric patients weighing 10 kg and over with aHUS who have not previously been treated with complement inhibitors (complement inhibitor-naïve patients) or have received eculizumab for at least months, with evidence of a response to eculizumab.

Generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG)

Ultomiris is used as an add-on to the standard treatment of adult patients with gMG who are anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)

Ultomiris is used in the treatment of adult patients with NMOSD who are anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody-positive (see “Properties/Effects” section).

Dosage/Administration

Ravulizumab must be administered by healthcare professionals and under the supervision of a physician experienced in the treatment of patients with haematological, renal, neuromuscular or neuroinflammatory disorders.

Before initiating treatment it should be ensured that active meningococcal infection/sepsis is not present and that the patient has been adequately vaccinated against meningococcal disease according to the official vaccination recommendations (see “Contraindications” and “Warnings and precautions”).

 

To ensure traceability of biotechnological medicinal products, it is recommended that the trade name and batch number should be documented for each treatment.

Adult patients with PNH, aHUS, gMG or NMOSD

The recommended dosing regimen consists of a loading dose followed by maintenance dosing, administered by intravenous infusion. The doses to be administered are based on the patient's body weight, as shown in Table 1. In adult patients (≥ 18 years of age), the maintenance doses should be administered at 8-week intervals, starting weeks after administration of the loading dose. The dosing regimen may occasionally vary by ± days from the scheduled infusion day (except for the first maintenance dose of ravulizumab) but the subsequent dose should be administered according to the original schedule.

For patients being switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab, the loading dose of ravulizumab should be administered weeks after the last eculizumab infusion. Maintenance doses are then administered once every weeks, starting weeks after administration of the loading dose, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1:  Ravulizumab weight-based dosing regimen for adult patients with body weight greater than or equal to 40 kg.

Body weight (kg)

Loading dose (mg)

Maintenance dose (mg)*

Dose interval

≥40 to <60

2400

3000

Every weeks

≥60 to <100

2700

3300

Every weeks

≥100

3000

3600

Every weeks

*The first maintenance dose is administered 2 weeks after the loading dose.

Supplemental dosing following plasma exchange (PE), plasmapheresis (PP) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)

Plasma exchange (PE), plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) have been shown to reduce ravulizumab serum levels. A supplemental dose of ravulizumab is required in treatments such as PE, PP or IVIg (Table 2).

Table 2: Supplemental dose of ravulizumab after PP, PE, or IVIg

Body weight (kg)

Most recent ravulizumab dose (mg)

Supplemental dose (mg) following each PE or PP

Supplemental dose (mg) following completion of an IVIg cycle

40 to <60

2400

1200

600

3000

1500

60 to <100

2700

1500

600

3300

1800

100

3000

1500

600

3600

1800

Timing of ravulizumab supplemental dose

Within 4 hours following each PE or PP intervention

Within 4 hours following completion of an IVIg cycle

Abbreviations: IVIg = intravenous immunoglobulin, kg = kilogram, PE = plasma exchange, PP = plasmapheresis

PNH is a chronic disease. It is therefore recommended to continue treatment with ravulizumab for the patient's lifetime, unless discontinuation of ravulizumab is clinically indicated (see "Warnings and precautions" section).

In aHUS, ravulizumab treatment to resolve thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) manifestations should be for a minimum duration of 6 months. After that, the duration of treatment should be decided individually for each patient. In patients who, in the treating physician’s opinion (or according to the clinical indication), have a higher risk of recurrence of TMA, long-term treatment may be necessary (see “Warnings and precautions” section).

In patients with gMG or NMOSD, treatment with ravulizumab has only been studied in the setting of chronic administration (see “Warnings and precautions” section).

Ravulizumab has not been studied in gMG patients with MGFA Class V.

Patients with hepatic disorders

The safety and efficacy of ravulizumab have not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment; however, pharmacokinetic data suggest that no dose adjustment is required in patients with hepatic impairment.

Patients with renal disorders

No dose adjustment is required in patients with renal impairment (see "Pharmacokinetics" section).

Elderly patients

No dose adjustment is required for patients with PNH, aHUS, gMG or NMOSD aged 65 years and over. There is no evidence indicating that special precautions are required for treating geriatric patients. There is, however, only limited experience with ravulizumab in in elderly patients with PNH, aHUS or NMOSD.

Children and adolescents

Children and adolescents with PNH and aHUS weighing ≥ 40 kg are treated according to the dosage recommendations for adults (Table 1). Table 3 shows the doses and dose intervals calculated by body weight for children and adolescents weighing ≥ 10 kg to < 40 kg.

In patients switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab, the loading dose of ravulizumab should be administered 2 weeks after the last eculizumab infusion. Maintenance doses should then be administered according to a dosing regimen based on body weight, as shown in Table 3, starting 2 weeks after administration of the loading dose.

Table 3: Weight-based ravulizumab dosage regimen in children and adolescents with PNH or aHUS weighing less than 40 kg

Body weight (kg)

Loading dose (mg)

Maintenance dose (mg)*

Dose interval

10 to <20

600

600

Every 4 weeks

20 to <30

900

2100

Every 8 weeks

30 to <40

1200

2700

Every 8 weeks

*The first maintenance dose is administered 2 weeks after the loading dose.

The safety and efficacy of ravulizumab in children with PNH or aHUS weighing under 10 kg have not yet been studied. The currently available data are described in the Undesirable effects section, but no dosage recommendations can be given.

Ravulizumab has not been studied in children and adolescents with PNH who weigh less than 30 kg. The dosage of ravulizumab in children and adolescents under 30 kg is based on the dosage used for children and adolescents with aHUS and on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data available for aHUS and PNH patients treated with ravulizumab.

The safety and efficacy of ravulizumab in children with gMG or NMOSD have not yet been studied. No data are available.

Mode of administration

For intravenous infusion only.

This medicinal product must be administered through a 0.µm filter and should not be administered as an intravenous push or bolus injection.

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL concentrate for solution for infusion must not be mixed with Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL or 1100 mg/11 mL concentrate for solution for infusion.

Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

Ultomiris concentrate for solution for infusion is presented in 3 mL and 11 mL vials (100 mg/mL) and must be diluted to a final concentration of 50 mg/mL. Following dilution, Ultomiris is administered as an intravenous infusion using a syringe pump or infusion pump over a minimum period of 10 to 75 minutes (0.17 to 1.3 hours), depending on body weight (see Tables 4 and 5 below).

Table 4: Infusion rate for doses of Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

Body weight
(kg)a

Loading dose (mg)

Minimum infusion time

Minutes
(hours)

Maintenance dose (mg)

Minimum infusion time

Minutes (hours)

≥10 to <20b

600

45 (0.8)

600

45 (0.8)

≥20 to <30 b

900

35 (0.6)

2100

75 (1.3)

≥30 to <40 b

1200

31 (0.5)

2700

65 (1.1)

≥40 to <60

2400

45 (0.8)

3000

55 (0.9)

≥60 to <100

2700

35 (0.6)

3300

40 (0.7)

≥100

3000

25 (0.4)

3600

30 (0.5)

a Body weight at the time of treatment.

b For PNH and aHUS indications only.

Table 5: Infusion rate for supplemental doses of Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

Body weight range (kg)a

Supplemental doseb (mg)

Minimum infusion duration

minutes (hours)

≥40 to <60

 

600

15 (0.25)

1200

25 (0.42)

1500

30 (0.5)

≥60 to <100

600

12 (0.20)

1500

22 (0.36)

1800

25 (0.42)

≥100

600

10 (0.17)

1500

15 (0.25)

1800

17 (0.28)

a Body weight at time of treatment.

b Refer to Table 2 for selection of ravulizumab supplemental dose

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

Ultomiris concentrate for solution for infusion is presented in 30 mL vials (10 mg/mL) and must be diluted to a final concentration of mg/mL. Following dilution, Ultomiris is administered as an intravenous infusion using a syringe pump or infusion pump over a minimum period of 22 to 194 minutes (0.4 to 3.hours), depending on body weight (see Tables 6 and 7 below).

Table 6: Infusion rate for doses of Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

Body weighta (kg)

Loading dose (mg)

Minimum duration of infusion

Minutes (hours)

Maintenance dose (mg)

Minimum duration of infusion

Minutes (hours)

≥10 to <20b

600

113 (1.9)

600

113 (1.9)

≥20 to <30b

900

86 (1.5)

2100

194 (3.3)

≥30 to <40b

1200

77 (1.3)

2700

167 (2.8)

≥40 to <60

2400

114 (1.9)

3000

140 (2.3)

≥60 to <100

2700

102 (1.7)

3300

120 (2.0)

≥100

3000

108 (1.8)

3600

132 (2.2)

a Body weight at time of treatment.

b For PNH and aHUS indications only.

 

Table 7: Infusion rate for supplemental doses of Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

Body weight range (kg)a

Supplemental dose b (mg)

Minimum infusion duration
minutes (hours)

≥40 to <60

 

600

30 (0.5)

1200

60 (1.0)

1500

72 (1.2)

≥60 to <100

600

23 (0.4)

1500

60 (1.0)

1800

65 (1.1)

≥100

600

22 (0.4)

1500

60 (1.0)

1800

65 (1.1)

a Body weight at time of treatment.

b Refer to Table 2 for selection of ravulizumab supplemental dose

For instructions on dilution of the medicinal product before administration, see "Instructions for handling" section.

Contraindications

- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the substances listed in the "Excipients" section.

- Patients with unresolved Neisseria meningitidis infection at treatment initiation (see "Warnings and precautions" section).

- Patients who are not currently vaccinated against Neisseria meningitidis unless they receive appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for weeks after vaccination (see "Warnings and precautions" section).

- Patients with hereditary complement deficiencies (see “Warnings and precautions” section).

Warnings and precautions

Serious meningococcal infection

Due to its mechanism of action, ravulizumab increases the patient's susceptibility to meningococcal infection/sepsis (Neisseria meningitidis). Meningococcal disease due to any serogroup may occur (see “Undesirable effects” section). To reduce this risk of infection, all patients must be vaccinated against meningococcal infections at least two weeks prior to starting treatment with ravulizumab, unless the risk of postponing treatment with ravulizumab outweighs the risk of meningococcal infection. Patients who start ravulizumab treatment less than weeks after receiving a meningococcal vaccine must receive treatment with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics until weeks after vaccination. Vaccines against serogroups A, C, Y, W135 and B, where available, are recommended for prevention of the commonly pathogenic meningococcal serogroups. Patients must be vaccinated or revaccinated according to the official vaccination guidelines. If the patient is being switched from eculizumab treatment, the physician should verify that there is adequate protection against meningococcal disease according to the official vaccination guidelines.

Vaccination may not be sufficient to prevent meningococcal infection. The official guidelines on the appropriate use of antibiotics should be taken into account. Cases of serious or fatal meningococcal infections/sepsis have been reported in patients treated with ravulizumab and in patients treated with other terminal complement inhibitors. All patients should be monitored for early signs of meningococcal infection and sepsis, evaluated immediately if infection is suspected, and treated with appropriate antibiotics. Patients should be informed of these signs and symptoms and seek immediate medical care. Physicians should provide patients with the patient information brochure and patient safety card.

Immunisation

It is recommended that before the start of treatment with ravulizumab, patients start their vaccinations according to the current vaccination guidelines.

Vaccination may further activate the complement. As a result, patients with complement-mediated diseases may experience increased signs and symptoms of their underlying disease. Patients should therefore be closely monitored for disease symptoms after the recommended vaccination.

Patients aged under 18 years must be vaccinated against Haemophilus influenzae and pneumococcal infections, with rigorous adherence to the national vaccination recommendations for each age group.

Other systemic infections

Ravulizumab therapy should be administered with caution to patients with active systemic infections. Ravulizumab blocks terminal complement activation; patients may therefore have increased susceptibility to infections caused by Neisseria species and encapsulated bacteria. Serious infections with Neisseria species (other than Neisseria meningitidis), including disseminated gonococcal infections, have been observed.

Patients should be informed about potential severe infections and their signs and symptoms. Physicians should advise patients about gonorrhoea prevention.

Infusion-related reactions

Administration of ravulizumab may result in systemic infusion-related reactions and allergic or hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis (see “Undesirable effects” section).

In clinical trials, infusion-related reactions were common (1%). These reactions were mild to moderate in severity and transient, including lower back pain, abdominal pain, muscle cramps, drop in blood pressure, rise in blood pressure, muscle rigidity, limb symptoms, drug sensitivity (allergic reaction), dysgeusia (altered sense of taste) and drowsiness. In the event of a systemic infusion-related reaction, if signs of cardiovascular instability or respiratory compromise occur, the administration of ravulizumab should be interrupted and appropriate supportive measures should be taken.

Discontinuation of treatment in PNH

If patients with PNH discontinue treatment with ravulizumab, they should be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of serious intravascular haemolysis. This is identified by elevated LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) values along with the following: sudden decrease in PNH clone size or sudden fall in haemoglobin, or re-appearance of symptoms such as tiredness/fatigue, haemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, shortness of breath (dyspnoea), major adverse vascular event (including thrombosis), dysphagia or erectile dysfunction. Patients who discontinue ravulizumab therapy should be monitored for at least 16 weeks for haemolysis and other reactions. If signs and symptoms of haemolysis occur after discontinuation, including elevated LDH values, consideration should be given to restarting administration of ravulizumab.

Discontinuation of treatment in aHUS

No specific data on the cessation of ravulizumab are available. In a long-term, prospective observational study, discontinuation of treatment with the complement C5 inhibitor (eculizumab) led to a 13.5 times higher rate of TMA recurrence, and there was a tendency towards a decline in kidney function compared with patients who continued the treatment.

If patients need to discontinue treatment with ravulizumab, they should be continuously and closely monitored for signs and symptoms of TMA. However, it is possible that monitoring is not sufficient for predicting or preventing serious TMA complications.

Complications of TMA after cessation of treatment can be identified by any of the following observations:

(i)At least two of the following laboratory findings are simultaneously present: a decrease of at least 25% in the platelet count from either the baseline count or the highest platelet count during ravulizumab treatment; increase of at least 25% in serum creatinine from the baseline value or from the lowest value during ravulizumab treatment; or increase of at least 25% in serum LDH from the baseline value or from the lowest value during ravulizumab treatment (the results should be confirmed by a second measurement) or

(ii)any of the following symptoms of TMA: change in mental state or seizures or other extrarenal manifestations of TMA, including cardiovascular abnormalities, pericarditis, gastrointestinal symptoms/diarrhoea or thrombosis.

If complications of TMA occur after cessation of ravulizumab, resumption of ravulizumab treatment with the loading and maintenance doses should be considered (see “Dosage/Administration” section).

Treatment discontinuation in gMG

Given that gMG is a chronic disease, patients benefiting from ravulizumab treatment who discontinue treatment should be monitored for symptoms of the underlying disease. If symptoms of gMG occur after discontinuation, consideration should be given to restarting treatment with ravulizumab.

Switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab

In patients with gMG who are not responding to the eculizumab approved dosing regimen, treatment with ravulizumab is not recommended.

 

Discontinuation of treatment in NMOSD

Ravulizumab for the treatment of NMOSD has only been studied in the context of long-term use and the effect of discontinuing ravulizumab has not been described. Patients in whom Ultomiris treatment has been discontinued should be closely monitored for signs of a possible relapse of the NMOSD.

Patients with Shiga toxin-producing E. coli haemolytic uraemic syndrome (STEC-HUS)

No data are available on the use of Ultomiris in patients with STEC-HUS.

Sodium content

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

When diluted with sodium chloride mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection, the maximum dose of this medicinal product contains 2.65 g sodium per 720 mL, equivalent to 133% of the WHO-recommended maximum daily intake of g sodium for an adult.

Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

When diluted with sodium chloride mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection, the maximum dose of this medicinal product contains 0.18 g sodium per 72 mL, equivalent to 9.1% of the WHO-recommended maximum daily intake of g sodium for an adult.

Interactions

No interaction studies have been performed.

Based on the potential inhibitory effect of ravulizumab on the complement-dependent cytotoxicity of rituximab, ravulizumab may reduce the expected pharmacodynamic effects of rituximab.

See “Dosage/Administration” section for guidance in case of concomitant PE, PP or IVIg treatment.

Chronic intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment may interfere with the endosomal neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) recycling mechanism of monoclonal antibodies such as ravulizumab and thereby decrease serum ravulizumab concentrations.

Pregnancy, lactation

Pregnancy

Women of child-bearing age

Women of childbearing age must use effective contraception methods during treatment and for up to months afterwards.

Pregnancy

No clinical data on the use of ravulizumab in pregnant patients are available.

Non-clinical reproductive toxicology studies were not conducted with ravulizumab (see "Preclinical data" section). Reproductive toxicology studies which assessed the effect of C5 blockade on the reproductive system were conducted in mice using the murine surrogate molecule BB5.1. No specific test article-related reproductive toxicities were identified in these studies. Human IgG is known to cross the human placental barrier, and thus ravulizumab may potentially cause terminal complement inhibition in the foetal circulation. Insufficient data are available from animal studies with respect to reproductive toxicity (see "Preclinical data" section).

The use of ravulizumab may be considered in pregnant women following a benefit-risk analysis.

Lactation

It is unknown whether ravulizumab is excreted in human milk. Non-clinical reproductive toxicology studies conducted in mice with the murine surrogate molecule BB5.1 identified no adverse effects in the young resulting from consuming milk from treated dams.

A risk to the infant cannot be excluded.

Since many medicinal products and immunoglobulins are excreted in human milk, and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breast-fed infants, breast-feeding should be discontinued during treatment with ravulizumab and for up to 8 months afterwards.

Fertility

No specific non-clinical studies on fertility have been conducted with ravulizumab.

Non-clinical reproductive toxicology studies conducted in mice with a murine surrogate molecule (BB5.1) identified no adverse effects on the fertility of the treated females or males.

Effects on ability to drive and use machines

Ultomiris has no or negligible influence on the ability to drive and use machines.

Undesirable effects

Summary of the safety profile

The safety profile of Ultomiris is based on ongoing and completed clinical trials involving a total of 804 patients treated with Ultomiris. The most common adverse reactions to ravulizumab are headache (28.2%), upper respiratory tract infection (19.9%), nasopharyngitis (19.5%), diarrhoea (16.9%), fever (16.4%), nausea (13.7%), arthralgia (13.2%), tiredness/fatigue (13.1%), back pain (12.6%), abdominal pain (11.8%) and dizziness (10.1%). The most serious adverse reactions are meningococcal infections (0.7%), including meningococcal sepsis, meningococcal encephalitis and meningococcal infection (see "Warnings and precautions" section), and disseminated gonococcal infection (0.1%).

Tabulated list of adverse reactions

Table 8 gives the adverse reactions observed in clinical trials and during post-marketing surveillance.

Adverse reactions are listed by MedDRA system organ class and frequency using the following convention: very common (≥1/10); common (≥1/100, <1/10); uncommon (≥1/1000, <1/100); rare (≥1/10,000, <1/1000); very rare (<1/10,000); and not known (frequency cannot be estimated from available data).

Within each frequency grouping, adverse reactions are presented in order of decreasing seriousness.

Table 8: Adverse reactions from clinical trials and post marketing

 

MedDRA system organ class

Very common

(≥1/10)

Common

(≥1/100, <1/10)

Uncommon ((≥1/1000, <1/100)

Infections and infestations

Upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis

Urinary tract infection

Meningococcal infection a, disseminated gonococcal infection b

Immune system
disorders

 

Hypersensitivity d

Anaphylactic

reaction c,

 

Nervous system disorders

Headache

Dizziness

 

 

Gastrointestinal disorders

Diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal pain

Vomiting,

dyspepsia

 

Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

 

Urticaria, pruritus,

rash

 

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Back pain, arthralgia

Myalgia,

muscle spasms

 

General disorders and administration site conditions

Fever, tiredness/fatigue

Influenza-like illness, chills,

exhaustion

 

Injury, poisoning and
procedural complications

 

Infusion-related reaction

 

a Meningococcal infection includes the Preferred Terms (PT) meningococcal infection, meningococcal sepsis and meningococcal encephalitis

b Gonococcal infection includes disseminated gonococcal infection

c Estimated from post-marketing experience

d Hypersensitivity is an umbrella term for the Preferred Term (PT) drug hypersensitivity with connected causality and the Preferred Term hypersensitivity

Description of selected adverse reactions

Meningococcal infection/sepsis/encephalitis

Vaccination reduces but does not completely eliminate the risk of meningococcal infections. In clinical trials, <1% of patients developed serious meningococcal infections during treatment with ravulizumab. All of these were adults with PNH or NMOSD and had been vaccinated. Please refer to the "Warnings and precautions" section for information on the prevention and treatment of suspected meningococcal infection. Meningococcal infections in patients treated with ravulizumab presented as meningococcal sepsis and encephalitis. Patients should be informed of the signs and symptoms of meningococcal septicaemia and of the need for immediate medical treatment.

Immunogenicity

Treatment with any therapeutic protein may induce an immune response. In adult PNH patient studies (N = 475), in a study in children and adolescents with PNH (N = 13), in aHUS studies (N = 89), in a gMG study (N = 86) and in an NMOSD study (N = 58) only two cases (0.3%) of the development of treatment-related anti-active substance antibodies have been reported with ravulizumab (adult patient with PNH and adult patient with aHUS). These anti-active substance antibodies were transient in nature with a low titre and did not correlate with clinical response or adverse events.

Children and adolescents

Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH)

In children and adolescents with PNH (N = 13, aged 9 to 17 years old) enrolled in the paediatric PNH study (ALXN1210-PNH-304), the safety profile appeared similar to that observed in adult PNH patients. The most common adverse reactions reported in children and adolescents with PNH were abdominal pain, nausea, nasopharyngitis and headache, which occurred in 3 patients (23.1%).

Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)

In children and adolescents with signs of aHUS (N = 34) (aged 10 months to under 18 years) who took part in the study ALXN1210-aHUS-312, the safety profile of ravulizumab seemed similar to that in adult patients with signs of aHUS. The safety profiles in the different paediatric age groups seem to be similar. The safety data for patients aged under years are limited to four patients. The most commonly reported adverse reaction in paediatric patients was fever (32.3%).

Generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG)

Ravulizumab has not been studied in children and adolescents with gMG.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)

Ravulizumab has not been studied in children and adolescents with NMOSD.

Reporting of suspected adverse reactions

Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is very important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions online via the ElViS portal (Electronic Vigilance System). You can obtain information about this at www.swissmedic.ch.

Overdose

No cases of overdose have been reported. Patients who experience overdose should have their infusion interrupted immediately and be closely monitored.

Properties/Effects

ATC-Code

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Immunosuppressants, selective immunosuppressants, ATC code: L04AA43

Mechanism of action

Ravulizumab is a monoclonal IgG2/4K antibody that specifically binds to the complement protein C5, thereby inhibiting its cleavage to C5a (the proinflammatory anaphylatoxin) and C5b (the initiating subunit of the membrane attack complex [MAC or C5b-9]) and preventing generation of C5b-9. Ravulizumab preserves the early components of complement activation that are essential for opsonisation of micro-organisms and clearance of immune complexes.

Pharmacodynamics

Following ravulizumab treatment in adult and paediatric patients with PNH not previously treated with complement inhibitors and patients with PNH previously treated with eculizumab in phase 3 trials, immediate, complete and sustained inhibition of serum free C5 (concentration of <0.µg/mL) was observed by the end of the first infusion and sustained throughout the entire 26-week treatment period in all patients. Immediate and complete inhibition of serum free C5 was also observed in adult and paediatric patients with aHUS, in adult patients with gMG and in adult patients with NMOSD by the end of the first infusion and throughout the 26-week treatment period.

The extent and duration of the pharmacodynamic response in patients with PNH, aHUS, gMG or NMOSD were exposure-dependent with ravulizumab. Free C5 concentrations less than 0.µg/mL were correlated with maximal intravascular haemolysis control and complete terminal complement inhibition. In gMG, terminal complement activation leads to MAC deposition at the neuromuscular junction and impairment of neuromuscular transmission. In NMOSD, uncontrolled terminal complement activation caused by anti-AQP4 autoantibodies leads to MAC- and C5a-dependent inflammation, which results in astrocyte necrosis, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier and damage to surrounding glial cells and neurons.

Clinical efficacy

Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH)

The safety and efficacy of ravulizumab in adult patients with PNH were assessed in two open-label, randomised, active-controlled phase 3 trials:

- a trial in adult patients with PNH who had not previously received complement inhibitor treatment,

- a trial in adult patients with PNH who were clinically stable after having been treated with eculizumab for at least the previous months.

Ravulizumab was administered in accordance with the recommended dosing regimen described in the "Dosage/Administration" section (infusions of ravulizumab over 26 weeks) while eculizumab was administered according to the approved dosing regimen for eculizumab of 600 mg every week for the first weeks and 900 mg every weeks (15 infusions over 26 weeks).

Patients were vaccinated against meningococcal infection prior to or at the start of treatment with ravulizumab or eculizumab, or received prophylactic treatment with appropriate antibiotics until weeks after vaccination.

There were no noteworthy differences in demographics or in characteristics present at start of the trial between the ravulizumab and eculizumab treatment groups in either of the phase 3 trials. The 12-month transfusion history was similar between the ravulizumab and eculizumab treatment groups within each of the phase 3 trials.

Study in adult patients with PNH who had not previously received complement inhibitor treatment (ALXN1210-PNH-301)

The study in patients not previously treated with complement inhibitors was a 26-week multicentre open-label randomised active-controlled phase 3 study, conducted in 246 patients who had not received complement inhibitor treatment prior to study entry, followed by a long-term extension phase in which all patients received ravulizumab. Patients eligible for this study had to demonstrate high disease activity, defined as an LDH value 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening along with the presence of one or more of the following PNH-related signs or symptoms in the months prior to screening: tiredness/fatigue, haemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, shortness of breath (dyspnoea), anaemia (haemoglobin <10 g/dL), history of a major adverse vascular event (including thrombosis), dysphagia or erectile dysfunction; or history of packed red blood cell transfusion due to PNH.

More than 80% of patients in both treatment groups had a history of transfusion in the 12 months prior to study entry. The majority of the study population from the study with patients not previously treated with complement inhibitors were highly haemolytic at baseline; 86.2% of enrolled patients had, in association with PNH, an elevated LDH value ≥3 × ULN, a direct measure of intravascular haemolysis.

Table 9 presents the baseline characteristics of the PNH patients enrolled in the study of patients not previously treated with complement inhibitors. No apparent clinically meaningful differences were observed between the treatment arms.

Table 9:  Baseline characteristics in the study of patients not previously treated with complement inhibitors

Parameter

Statistic

Ravulizumab
(
N = 125)

Eculizumab
(
N = 121)

Age (years) at PNH diagnosis

Mean (SD)

Median

Min; Max.

37.9 (14.90)

 

34.0

15; 81

39.6 (16.65)

 

36.5

13; 82

Age (years) at first infusion in study

Mean (SD)

Median

Min; Max.

44.8 (15.16)

 

43.0

18; 83

46.2 (16.24)

 

45.0

18; 86

Sex (n, %)

Male

Female

65 (52.0)

60 (48.0)

69 (57.0)

52 (43.0)

Pre-treatment LDH values

Mean (SD)

1633.5 (778.75)

1578.3 (727.06)

Median

1513.5

1445.0

Number of patients with packed red blood cell transfusions in the 12 months prior to the first dose

n (%)

103 (82.4)

100 (82.6)

Units of packed red blood cells transfused in the 12 months prior to the first dose

Total

925

861

Mean (SD)

9.0 (7.74)

8.6 (7.90)

Median

6.0

6.0

Total PNH red blood cell clone size

Median

33.6

34.2

Total PNH granulocyte clone size

Median

93.8

92.4

Patients with PNH-related symptoms and disordersa before study start

n (%)

121 (96.8)

120 (99.2)

Anaemia

 

103 (82.4)

105 (86.8)

Haematuria or haemoglobinuria

 

81 (64.8)

75 (62.0)

Aplastic anaemia

 

41 (32.8)

38 (31.4)

Kidney failure

 

19 (15.2)

11 (9.1)

Myelodysplastic syndrome

 

7 (5.6)

6 (5.0)

Pregnancy complication

 

3 (2.4)

4 (3.3)

Otherb

 

27 (21.6)

13 (10.7)

a Based on medical history.

b “Other” as specified on case report form included thrombocytopenia, chronic kidney disease and pancytopenia, as well as a number of other symptoms and disorders.

The coprimary endpoints were transfusion avoidance, and haemolysis as directly measured by normalisation of LDH values (LDH values ≤1 × ULN; the ULN for LDH is 246 U/L). Key secondary endpoints included the percentage change from baseline in LDH values, change in quality of life (FACIT Fatigue Score), the proportion of patients with breakthrough haemolysis and the proportion of patients with a stabilised haemoglobin level.

Ravulizumab was non-inferior compared to eculizumab for both coprimary endpoints, avoidance of packed red blood cell transfusion in accordance with protocol-specified guidelines and LDH normalisation from day 29 to day 183, and for all key secondary endpoints (Figure 1).

Figure 1:  Analysis of coprimary and secondary endpoints – full analysis set (study with patients not previously treated with complement inhibitors)

 

 

Ravulizumab
(
N = 125)

Eculizumab
(
N = 121)

Difference (95% CI)

Transfusion avoidance (%)

73.6

66.1

6.8 (-4.7; 18.1)

 

 

 

 

LDH normalisation

 

 

Odds ratio (95% CI)

(Odds Ratio)

53.6

49.4

1.19 (0.80; 1.77)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Difference (95% CI)

LDH change from baseline (%)

-76.8

-76.0

0.8 (-3.6; 5.2)

Change in FACIT Fatigue Score

7.1

6.4

0.7 (-1.2; 2.6)

Breakthrough haemolysis (%)

4.0

10.7

6.7 (-0.2; 14.2)

Haemoglobin stabilisation (%)

68.0

64.5

2.9 (-8.8; 14.6)

 

 

 

 

 

Favours eculizumab

Favours ravulizumab

 

 

 

Note: Black triangles indicate the non-inferiority margins; grey dots indicate point estimates.

Note: LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; CI = confidence interval; FACIT = Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy.

The concluding efficacy analysis in the study included all patients who had ever been treated with ravulizumab (n = 244), and the median duration of treatment was 1423 days. The concluding analysis confirmed that the response to ravulizumab treatment observed in the primary evaluation period was sustained throughout the study.

Study in adult PNH patients previously treated with eculizumab (ALXN1210-PNH-302)

The study in patients previously treated with eculizumab was a 26-week multicentre open-label randomised active-controlled phase 3 study conducted with 195 patients with PNH who were clinically stable (LDH 1.5 × ULN) after having been treated with eculizumab for at least the past months, followed by a long-term extension phase in which all patients received ravulizumab.

The PNH medical history was similar for the ravulizumab and eculizumab treatment groups. The 12-month transfusion history was similar for the ravulizumab and eculizumab treatment groups, and more than 87% of patients in both treatment groups had not received a transfusion in the 12 months prior to study entry. The mean total PNH red blood cell clone size was 60.05%, mean total PNH granulocyte clone size was 83.30%, and the mean total PNH monocyte clone size was 85.86%.

Table 10 presents the baseline characteristics of the PNH patients enrolled in the study of patients previously treated with eculizumab. No apparent clinically meaningful differences were observed between the treatment arms.

Table 10:  Baseline characteristics in the study of patients previously treated with eculizumab

Parameter

Statistic

Ravulizumab
(
N = 97)

Eculizumab
(
N = 98)

Age (years) at PNH diagnosis

Mean (SD)

Median

Min; Max.

34.1 (14.41)

32.0

6, 73

36.8 (14.14)

35.0

11, 74

Age (years) at first infusion in the study

Mean (SD)

Median

Min; Max.

46.6 (14.41)

45.0

18, 79

48.8 (13.97)

49.0

23, 77

Sex (n, %)

Male

Female

50 (51.5)

47 (48.5)

48 (49.0)

50 (51.0)

Pre-treatment LDH values

Mean (SD)

228.0 (48.71)

235.2 (49.71)

Median

224.0

234.0

Number of patients with packed red blood cell/whole blood transfusions in the 12 months prior to the first dose

n (%)

13 (13.4)

12 (12.2)

Units of packed red blood cells/whole blood transfused in the 12 months prior to the first dose

Total

103

50

Mean (SD)

7.9 (8.78)

4.2 (3.83)

Median

4.0

2.5

Patients with PNH-related symptoms and disordersa before study start

n (%)

90 (92.8)

96 (98.0)

Anaemia

 

64 (66.0)

67 (68.4)

Haematuria or haemoglobinuria

 

47 (48.5)

48 (49.0)

Aplastic anaemia

 

34 (35.1)

39 (39.8)

Kidney failure

 

11 (11.3)

7 (7.1)

Myelodysplastic syndrome

 

3 (3.1)

6 (6.1)

Pregnancy complication

 

4 (4.1)

9 (9.2)

Otherb

 

14 (14.4)

14 (14.3)

a Based on medical history.

b “Other” category included neutropenia, renal dysfunction and thrombocytopenia, as well as a number of other symptoms and disorders.

The primary endpoint was haemolysis as measured by percentage change in LDH values from baseline. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with breakthrough haemolysis, quality-of-life (FACIT Fatigue Score), transfusion avoidance and proportion of patients with a stabilised haemoglobin level.

Ravulizumab was non-inferior compared to eculizumab for the primary endpoint, percentage change in LDH from baseline to day 183, and for all key secondary endpoints (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Analysis of coprimary and secondary endpoints – full analysis set (study with patients previously treated with eculizumab)

 

 

Ravulizumab
(
N = 97)

Eculizumab
(
N = 98)

Difference (95% CI)

 

 

 

 

LDH change from baseline (%)

-0.8

8.4

9.2 (-0.4; 18.8)

 

 

 

 

Breakthrough haemolysis (%)

0

5.1

5.1 (-8.9; 19.0)

Change in FACIT Fatigue Score

2.0

0.5

1.5 (-0.2; 3.2)

 

 

 

 

Transfusion avoidance (%)

87.6

82.7

5.5 (-4.3; 15.7)

Haemoglobin stabilisation (%)

76.3

75.5

1.4 (-10.4; 13.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Favours eculizumab

Favours ravulizumab

 

 

 

Note: Black triangles indicate the non-inferiority margins; grey dots indicate point estimates.

Note: LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; CI = confidence interval.

 

The concluding efficacy analysis in the study included all patients who had ever been treated with ravulizumab (n = 192) and had a mean duration of treatment of 968 days. The concluding analysis confirmed that the response to ravulizumab treatment observed in the primary evaluation period was sustained throughout the study.

 

Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)

Study in adult patients with aHUS (ALXN1210-aHUS-311)

The study in adults was a multicentre, single-arm, phase 3 clinical study in patients with documented aHUS who had not had any treatment with a complement inhibitor prior to enrolment in this study and showed signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). The study consisted of a 26-week initial evaluation period and the patients had the option of participating in an extension of up to 4.5 years.

A total of 58 patients with documented aHUS were enrolled. The inclusion criteria excluded patients who had TMA resulting from thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) or Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli haemolytic uraemic syndrome (STEC-HUS). Two patients were excluded from the complete analysis set because of a confirmed diagnosis of STEC-HUS. At the start of the study, 93% of the patients showed extrarenal (cardiovascular, pulmonary, central nervous, gastrointestinal, cutaneous or musculoskeletal) signs or symptoms of aHUS.

Table 11 shows the demographic characteristics and baseline characteristics of 56 adult patients who were included in study ALXN1210-aHUS-311 and formed the complete analysis set.

Table 11: Baseline characteristics in the study in adults

Parameter

Statistic

Ravulizumab
(N = 56)

Age at first infusion (years)

Mean (SD)

Min., Max.

42.2 (14.98)

19.5; 76.6

Sex

 male

 

n (%)

 

19 (33.9)

Racea

 Asian

 White

 Other

n (%)

 

15 (26.8)

29 (51.8)

12 (21.4)

History of transplant

n (%)

8 (14.3)

Platelet count  109/L)

n

Median (min., max.)

56

95.25 (18; 473)

Blood haemoglobin (g/L)

n

Median (min., max.)

56

85.00 (60.5; 140)

Serum LDH (U/L)

n

Median (min., max.)

56

508.00 (229.5; 3,249)

eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

n (%)

Median (min., max.)

55

10.00 (4; 80)

Dialysis patients

N (%)

29 (51.8)

Post-partum patients

N (%)

8 (14.3)

Note: the percentages are based on the total number of patients.

Abbreviations: eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; Max. = maximum; Min. = minimum.

The primary endpoint was the complete response of the TMA during the 26-week period for the first assessment, demonstrated by normalisation of the haematological parameters (platelet count ≥150 × 109/L and LDH ≤246 U/L) and an improvement in serum creatinine by ≥25% compared with the baseline value. Patients had to fulfil each criterion for a complete response of the TMA at 2 different assessments separated by an interval of at least 4 weeks (28 days) and at each measurement in between.

A complete response of the TMA was observed in 30 of the 56 patients (53.6%) during the 26-week period for the first assessment, as shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Analysis of the complete response of the TMA and the components of the complete response of the TMA during the 26-week period for the first assessment (ALXN1210-aHUS-311)

 

Total

Responders

n

Fraction (95% CI)a

Complete response of the TMA

56

30

0.536 (0.396; 0.675)

Components of the complete response of the TMA

 

 

 

Normalisation of the platelet count

56

47

0.839 (0.734; 0.944)

Normalisation of LDH

56

43

0.768 (0.648; 0.887)

≥25% improvement in the serum creatinine compared with baseline

56

33

0.589 (0.452; 0.727)

Normalisation of the blood values

56

41

0.732 (0.607; 0.857)

a The 95% CIs for the fraction were based on the asymptotic Gaussian approximation method with continuity correction.

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; TMA = thrombotic microangiopathy.

Four further patients showed a complete response of the TMA, which was confirmed after the 26-week period for the first assessment (the complete response of the TMA was observed on days 169, 302, 401 and 407). Thus, a total of 34 out of 56 patients showed a complete response of the TMA (60.7%; 95% CI: 47.0%, 74.4%). The number for the response of individual components increased to 48 patients (85.7%; 95% CI: 75.7%, 95.8%) for the normalisation of the platelet count, to 47 patients (83.9%; 95% CI: 73.4%, 94.4%) for the normalisation of LDH, and to 35 patients (62.5%; 95% CI: 48.9%, 76.1%) for improvement in kidney function.

A complete response of the TMA was achieved within a median period of 86 days (7 to 169 days). An increase in the mean platelet count was observed soon after the start of ravulizumab treatment, with a rise from 118.52 × 109/L at the start of the study to 240.34 × 109/L on day 8 being observed. The value remained above 227 × 109/L at all subsequent visits during the period for the first assessment (26 weeks). Similarly, the mean LDH value decreased from the baseline value during the first 2 months of treatment, and the decrease was maintained throughout the period for the first assessment (26 weeks).

Of the patients who presented with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, 67.6% (23/34) showed an improvement in the chronic kidney disease of 1 or more stages. The stage of the chronic kidney disease continued to improve in many patients (19/30) after a complete response of the TMA was achieved during the 26-week period for the first assessment. Of the 29 patients who were dialysis-dependent at the time of enrolment in the study, 17 were able to discontinue dialysis treatment by the end of the available follow-up period, while 6 out of 27 patients who were not receiving any dialysis treatment at the start of the study were receiving dialysis treatment at the last available follow-up examination. Table 13 summarises the secondary efficacy results from study ALXN1210-aHUS-311.

Table 13: Secondary efficacy result for study ALXN1210-aHUS-311

Parameter

Study ALXN1210-aHUS-311

(N = 56)

Haematological parameters in TMA, day 183

Blood platelet count (109/L)

     Mean (SD)

     Median

Serum LDH (U/L)

     Mean (SD)

     Median

Observed value

(n = 48)

 

237.96 (73.528)

232.00

 

194.46 (58.099)

176.50

Change from baseline (n = 48)

 

 

114.79 (105.568)

125.00

 

-519.83 (572.467)

-310.75

≥20 g/L increase in haemoglobin from baseline with a confirmatory result by the end of the period for the first assessment

m/n

Fraction (95% CI)**

 

 

 

 

40/56

0.714 (0.587; 0.842)

Change from baseline in CKD stage, day 183

 Improvementa

   m/n

   Fraction (95% CI)*

 Deteriorationb

   m/n

   Fraction (95% CI)*

 

 

 

32/47

0.681 (0.529; 0.809)

 

2/13

0.154 (0.019; 0.454)

eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), day 183

 

Mean (SD)

Median

Observed value (n = 48)

 

51.83 (39.162)

40.00

Change from baseline (n = 47)

 

34.80 (35.454)

29.00

Note: n: number of patients with available data for a defined examination at the visit on day 183. m: number of patients who fulfil a defined criterion. The stage of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) is determined using the chronic kidney disease stage classification of the National Kidney Foundation. Stage 5 is the worst category, whereas stage 1 is the best category. The baseline value is determined using the last available eGFR before the start of treatment. Improvement/deterioration: compared with the CKD stage at the start of the study. *The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are based on the exact Clopper-Pearson confidence interval. aExcludes patients with stage 1 CKD at the start of the study, because no improvement is possible in them. bExcludes patients with stage 5 at the start of the study, as no deterioration is possible in them.

Abbreviations: eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; TMA = thrombotic microangiopathy.

Generalised Myasthenia Gravis (gMG)

Study in adult patients with gMG

The efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in adult patients with gMG was assessed in a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (ALXN1210-MG-306). Patients participating in this study were subsequently allowed to enter an open-label extension phase during which all patients received ravulizumab.

Patients with gMG (diagnosed at least 6 months previously) and a positive serum test for anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies, MGFA (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America) clinical classification Class II to IV and residual symptomatology as evidenced by a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total score 6 were randomised to treatment with either ravulizumab (N = 86) or placebo (N = 89). Patients on immunosuppressant therapies (corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus) were permitted to continue on this previous therapy throughout the course of the study. In addition, a rescue therapy (including high-dose corticosteroids, PE/PP or IVIg) was allowed if a patient experienced clinical deterioration, as defined by the study protocol.

A total of 162 (92.6%) patients completed the 26-week randomised, controlled period of study ALXN1210-MG-306. The characteristics of patients at baseline are presented in Table 14. The overwhelming majority of patients enrolled in the study (97%) had been treated with at least one immunomodulatory therapy, including immunosuppressant therapies, PE/PP or IVIg, in the last two years prior to study enrolment.

Table 14: Baseline characteristics in study ALXN1210-MG-306

Parameter

Statistic

Placebo

(N = 89)

Ravulizumab

(N = 86)

Sex
 Male
 Female

n (%)


44 (49.4)

45 (50.6)


42 (48.8)

44 (51.2)

Age at first dose of study drug (years)

Mean (SD)
(min, max)

53.3 (16.05)
(20, 82)

58.0 (13.82)
(19, 79)

Elderly (65 years of age) at study entry

n (%)

24 (27.0)

30 (34.9)

Duration of MG since diagnosis (years)

Mean (SD)
(min, max)

Median

10.0 (8.90)
(0.5, 36.1)

7.6

9.8 (9.68)
(0.5, 39.5)

5.7

Baseline MG-ADL score

Mean (SD)
(min, max)

Median

8.9 (2.30)
(6.0, 15.0)

9.0

9.1 (2.62)
(6.0, 24.0)

9.0

Baseline QMG score

Mean (SD)

(min, max)
Median

14.5 (5.26)

(2.0, 27.0)
14.0

14.8 (5.21)

(6.0, 39.0)
15.0

Baseline MGFA classification
 
Class II (mild weakness)
 
Class III (moderate weakness)
 
Class IV (severe weakness)

n (%)


39 (44)

45 (51)

5 (6)


39 (45)

41 (48)

6 (7)

Any prior intubation since diagnosis (MGFA V)

n (%)

9 (10.1)

8 (9.3)

Number of patients with prior MG crisis since diagnosisa

n (%)

17 (19.1)

21 (24.4)

Number of stable immunosuppressant therapiesb at study entry

0

1

2

n (%)



8 (9.0)

34 (38.2)

47 (52.8)



10 (11.6)

40 (46.5)

36 (41.9)

a Information on prior MG crises was collected as part of the medical history and not evaluated as per the clinical protocol definition.

b Immunosuppressant therapies include corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus.

Abbreviations: Max = maximum; min = minimum; MG = myasthenia gravis; MG-ADL = Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living; MGFA = Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America; QMG = Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis; SD = standard deviation

The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 26 in the MG-ADL total score.

The secondary endpoints, which also assessed changes from baseline to Week 26, included the change in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total score, the proportion of patients with improvements of at least 5 and 3 points in the QMG and MG-ADL total scores, respectively, and changes in quality-of-life assessments.

Ravulizumab demonstrated a statistically significant change in the MG-ADL total score compared to placebo. Primary and secondary endpoints are presented in Table 15.

 

Table 15: Analysis of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints

Efficacy endpoints at Week 26

Placebo

(N = 89)

LS mean (SEM)

Ravulizumab

(N = 86)

LS mean (SEM)

Statistic for comparison

Treatment effect
(95% CI)

p value

(using mixed effect repeated measures)

MG-ADL

-1.4 (0.37)

-3.1 (0.38)

Difference in change from baseline

-1.6 (-2.6; -0.7)

0.0009

QMG

-0.8 (0.45)

-2.8 (0.46)

Difference in change from baseline

-2.0 (-3.2; -0.8)

0.0009

MG-QoL15r

-1.6 (0.70)

-3.3 (0.71)

Difference in change from baseline

-1.7 (-3.4; 0.1)

0.0636

Neuro-QoL-fatigue

-4.8 (1.87)

-7.0 (1.92)

Difference in change from baseline

-2.2 (-6.9; 2.6)

0.3734 a

a The endpoint was not formally tested for statistical significance; a nominal p value was reported.

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; LS = least squares; MG-ADL = Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living; MG-QoL15r = Revised Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item scale; Neuro-QoL-fatigue = Neurological Quality of Life Fatigue; QMG = Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis; SEM = standard error of the mean.

In study ALXN1210-MG-306, a clinical responder on the MG-ADL total score was defined as a patient with at least a 3-point improvement. The proportion of clinical responders at Week 26 was 56.7% on ravulizumab compared with 34.1% on placebo (nominal p=0.0049). A clinical responder on the QMG total score was defined as a patient with at least a 5-point improvement. The proportion of clinical responders at Week 26 was 30.0% on ravulizumab compared with 11.3% on placebo (p=0.0052).

Table 16 shows an overview of patients with clinical deterioration and patients requiring rescue therapy over the 26-week randomised, controlled period.

 

Table 16: Clinical deterioration and rescue therapy

Variable

Statistic

Placebo
(N = 89)

Ravulizumab
(N = 86)

Total number of patients with clinical deterioration

n (%)

15 (16.9)

8 (9.3)

Total number of patients requiring rescue therapya

n (%)

14 (15.7)

8 (9.3)

a Rescue therapy included high-dose corticosteroid, plasma exchange/plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin.

 

At the time of the analysis, 150 of the 158 patients who entered the open-label extension phase were still participating in the study.

In patients who initially received ULTOMIRIS during the randomised, controlled period and continued to receive ULTOMIRIS during the first 34 weeks of the open-label extension phase, the treatment effect was sustained (Figure 3). In patients who initially received placebo during the 26-week randomised, controlled period and commenced treatment with ULTOMIRIS during the open-label extension phase, a rapid and sustained treatment response was observed (Figure 3).

 

Figure 3: Change in MG-ADL total score (A) and QMG total score (B) compared to baseline within the randomised, controlled period up to and including week 60 (mean and 95% CI)

Picture 4

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; MG-ADL = Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living; QMG = Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis

In the open-label extension phase of the study, clinicians had the option to adjust immunosuppressant therapies. In the patients who were observed for 34 weeks in the open-label extension phase, 28.0% of patients decreased their daily dose of corticosteroid therapy and 6.2% of patients stopped corticosteroid therapy. The most common reason for change in corticosteroid therapy was an improvement in MG symptoms during treatment with ravulizumab.

 

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)

Study in adult patients with NMOSD

The efficacy of ravulizumab in adult patients with anti-AQP4 antibody-positive NMOSD was assessed in the global, open-label clinical study ALXN1210-NMO-307.

Study ALXN1210-NMO-307 enrolled 58 adult patients with NMOSD who had a positive serum test for anti-AQP4 antibodies, at least 1 relapse in the last 12 months prior to the screening period, and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of ≤7. Prior treatment with immunosuppressant therapies (ISTs) was not required for enrolment and 51.7% of patients were on ravulizumab monotherapy. Patients on an established IST (i.e. corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus) were permitted to continue on therapy in combination with ravulizumab, with the requirement for stable dosing until they reached Week 106 of the study. In addition, acute therapy for relapse treatment (including high-dose corticosteroids, PE/PP and IVIg) was allowed if a patient experienced a relapse during the study.

 

Patients enrolled in the study had a median age of 47.4 (18-74) years and most of them were female (90%). Median age at initial clinical presentation of NMOSD was 42.5 years, ranging from 16 to 73 years. Table 17 shows their characteristics at the start of the study.

 

Table 17:  Patient disease history and baseline characteristics in study ALXN1210-NMO-307

Variable 

Statistic

ALXN1210-NMO-307

Ravulizumab
(N = 58)

Time from NMOSD initial clinical presentation to first dose of study drug (years) 

Mean (SD)

5.2 (6.38)

Median

2.0

Min., max

0.19; 24.49

Historical ARR within 24 months prior to screening 

Mean (SD)

1.87 (1.59)

Median

1.44

Min., max

0.5; 6.9

Baseline HAI score 

Mean (SD)

1.2 (1.42)

Median

1.0

Min., max

0.0; 7.0

Baseline EDSS score 

Mean (SD)

3.30 (1.58) 

Median

3.25

Min., max

0.0; 7.0

Any previous rituximab use 

n (%)

21 (36.2)

Number of patients receiving stable corticosteroids only at study entry  

n (%)

12 (20.7)

Number of patients not receiving any IST at study entry 

n (%)

30 (51.7)

Abbreviations: ARR = annualised relapse rate; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; HAI = Hauser Ambulation Index; IST = immunosuppressant therapy; max = maximum; min = minimum; NMOSD = neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; SD = standard deviation.

 

The primary endpoint of study ALXN1210-NMO-307 was the time to first on-trial relapse as determined by an independent adjudication committee. No adjudicated on-trial relapse was observed in ravulizumab-treated patients during the primary treatment period. All ravulizumab-treated patients remained relapse-free over the median follow-up period of 90.93 weeks. Ravulizumab-treated patients showed consistent relapse-free primary endpoint results with or without concomitant IST treatment.

Ravulizumab has not been studied for the acute treatment of relapses in NMOSD patients.

Safety and efficacy in paediatric patients

Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH)

Study in paediatric patients with PNH (ALXN1210-PNH-304)

The paediatric study (ALXN1210-PNH-304) is a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study conducted in children and adolescents with PNH who had either received previous treatment with eculizumab or had not previously been treated with a complement inhibitor. From the interim results, a total of 13 paediatric PNH patients completed treatment with ravulizumab during the primary evaluation period (26 weeks) of study ALXN1210-PNH-304. Five of the 13 patients had never been treated with a complement inhibitor and 8 patients had received treatment with eculizumab prior to study entry. Most of the patients were between 12 and 17 years of age at first infusion (mean age: 14.4 years), with two patients under 12 years of age (11 and 9 years). Eight of the 13 patients were female. The mean weight at the start of the study was 56 kg; the range was 37 to 72 kg. Table 18 shows the disease history and characteristics of the paediatric patients enrolled in study ALXN1210-PNH-304 at the start of the study.

Table 18: Disease History and Characteristics at the start of the study (Full Analysis Set)

Variable

Patients not previously treated with complement inhibitors

(N = 5)

Patients previously treated with eculizumab

(N = 8)

Total PNH red blood cell clone size (%)

(N = 4)

(N = 6)

 Median (min., max.)

40.05 (6.9; 68.1)

71.15 (21.2; 85.4)

Total PNH granulocyte clone size (%)

 

 

 Median (min., max.)

78.30 (36.8; 99.0)

91.60 (20.3; 97.6)

Number of patients with packed red blood cell/whole blood transfusions in the 12 months prior to the first dose, n (%)

2 (40.0)

2 (25.0)

Number of packed red blood cell/whole blood transfusions in the 12 months prior to the first dose

 

 

 Total

10

2

 Median (min.; max.)

5.0 (4; 6)

1.0 (1; 1)

Units of packed red blood cells/whole blood transfused in the 12 months prior to first dose

 

 

 Total

14

2

 Median (min., max.)

7.0 (3; 11)

2.0 (2; 2)

Patients with PNH-related disorders prior to patient information and informed consent, n (%)

5 (100)

8 (100)

Anaemia

2 (40.0)

5 (62.5)

 Haematuria or haemoglobinuria

2 (40.0)

5 (62.5)

 Aplastic anaemia

3 (60.0)

1 (12.5)

 Renal failure

2 (40.0)

2 (25.0)

 Othera

0

1 (12.5)

Pre-treatment LDH levels (U/L)

 

 

 Median (min., max.)

588.50 (444; 2269.7)

251.50 (140.5; 487)

a Other PNH-related disorders were reported as “renal and splenic infarcts” and “multiple lesions suggestive of an embolic process”.

Note: percentages are based on the total number of patients in each cohort.

Abbreviations: LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; max. = maximum; min. = minimum; PNH = paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobulinuria.

The patients received a loading dose of ravulizumab based on body weight on Day 1, followed by maintenance treatment on Day 15 and once every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter for patients weighing 20 kg, or once every 4 weeks (q4w) for patients weighing <20 kg. For patients who were receiving treatment with eculizumab at study entry, Day 1 of the study treatment was planned for 2 weeks after the patient’s last dose of eculizumab.

The weight-based dose regimen of ravulizumab provided immediate, complete and sustained terminal complement inhibition throughout the 26-week primary evaluation period, irrespective of whether the patients had received prior treatment with eculizumab. Following initiation of ravulizumab treatment, steady-state therapeutic serum concentrations of ravulizumab were achieved immediately after the first dose and maintained throughout the 26-week primary evaluation period in both cohorts. No breakthrough haemolysis events occurred during the study and no patients had post-baseline free C5 concentrations above 0.5 µg/mL. The mean percentage change in LDH value from baseline was -47.91% on Day 183 in the cohort not previously treated with a complement inhibitor and remained stable during the 26-week primary evaluation period in the cohort previously treated with eculizumab. Sixty percent (3/5) of patients not previously treated with a complement inhibitor and 75% (6/8) of patients previously treated with eculizumab achieved haemoglobin stabilisation by Week 26. Transfusion avoidance was achieved in 84.6% (11/13) of patients during the 26-week primary evaluation period.

These interim efficacy results are presented in Table 19 below.

Table 19: Efficacy results from the clinical study in paediatric PNH patients (ALXN1210-PNH-304) - 26-week primary evaluation period

Endpoint

Ravulizumab
(no previous treatment with complement inhibitors, N = 5)

Ravulizumab
(switch, previously treated with complement inhibitors, N = 8)

LDH percentage change from baseline

Mean (SD)

 

-47.91 (52.716)

 

4.65 (44.702)

Transfusion avoidance percentage (95% CI)

 

60.0 (14.66; 94.73)

 

100.0 (63.06; 100.00)

Haemoglobin stabilisation percentage (95% CI)

 

60.0 (14.66; 94.73)

 

75 (34.91; 96.81)

Breakthrough haemolysis (%)

0

0

Abbreviations: LDH = lactate dehydrogenase

The long-term results for efficacy by the end of the study over a median treatment period of 915 days showed a sustained response to the treatment in paediatric patients with PNH.

Based on these interim results, the efficacy of ravulizumab in paediatric PNH patients appears to be similar to that observed in adult PNH patients.

Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)

The use of Ultomiris in paediatric patients for the treatment of aHUS is supported by the results of a clinical study in children and adolescents (in total, 31 patients with documented aHUS were enrolled. 28 patients aged 10 months to 17 years were included in the complete analysis set).

Study in paediatric patients with aHUS (ALXN1210-aHUS-312)

This paediatric study was a 26-week, continuous, multicentre, single-arm, phase 3 study in children and adolescents.

In total, 21 patients without previous eculizumab treatment with the documented diagnosis of aHUS and evidence of TMA were enrolled in the study; of these, 18 were included in the complete analysis set. The inclusion criteria excluded patients who had TMA resulting from TTP and STEC-HUS. Two patients received one single dose and one patient received two doses; the patients then stopped the treatment and were excluded from the complete analysis set, because the aHUS was not confirmed. The mean body weight at the start of the study was 22.2 kg; the majority of the patients were in the weight category ≥10 to <20 kg at the start of the study. Most patients (72.2%) had extrarenal (cardiovascular, pulmonary, central nervous, gastrointestinal, cutaneous or musculoskeletal) signs or symptoms of aHUS before treatment at the start of the study. 33.3% (n = 6) of the patients had stage 5 CKD at the start of the study.

A total of 10 patients who were switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab and had a documented aHUS diagnosis and signs of TMA were enrolled in the study. A clinical response to eculizumab had to be present before the patients were enrolled in the study (i.e. LDH <1.5 × ULN and platelet count ≥150,000/µL and eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Consequently, there are no data on the use of ravulizumab in patients who do not respond to eculizumab.

Table 20 shows the baseline characteristics of paediatric patients who were enrolled in study ALXN1210-aHUS-312.

Table 20: Demographic characteristics and baseline characteristics in study ALXN1210-aHUS-312

Parameter

Statistic

Ravulizumab
(no previous treatment, N = 18)

Ravulizumab
(treatment switch, N = 10)

Age group at first infusion (years)

Birth to <2 years

2 to <6 years

6 to <12 years

12 to <18 years

n (%)

 

 

2 (11.1)

9 (50.0)

5 (27.8)

2 (11.1)

 

 

1 (10.0)

1 (10.0)

1 (10.0)

7 (70.0)

Sex

 male

n (%)

 

8 (44.4)

 

9 (90.0)

Ethnicitya

 Native American (Indian) or Alaskan

 Asian

 Black or African American

 White

 Unknown

n (%)

 

 

1 (5.6)

5 (27.8)

3 (16.7)

9 (50.0)

1 (5.6)

 

 

0 (0.0)

4 (40.0)

1 (10.0)

5 (50.0)

0 (0.0)

History of transplant

n (%)

1 (5.6)

1 (10.0)

Platelet count (× 109/L)

Median

(min., max.)

51.25

(14; 125)

281.75

(207; 415.5)

Haemoglobin (g/L)

Median

(min., max.)

74.25

(32; 106)

132.0

(114.5; 148)

LDH (U/L)

Median

(min., max.)

1963.0

(772; 4985)

206.5

(138.5; 356)

eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

Median

(min., max.)

22.0

(10; 84)

99.75

(54; 136.5)

Dialysis dependence at the start of the study

n (%)

6 (33.3)

0 (0.0)

Note: the percentages are based on the total number of patients.

a The patients may have several ethnicities.

Abbreviations: aHUS = atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; Max. = maximum; Min. = minimum.

The primary endpoint was the complete response of the TMA during the 26-week period for the first assessment, determined on the basis of the normalisation of the haematological parameters (platelet count ≥150 × 109/L and LDH ≤246 U/l) and an improvement in serum creatinine of ≥25% compared with the baseline value. Patients had to fulfil all criteria for a complete response of the TMA at 2 different assessments separated by an interval of at least 4 weeks (28 days) and at each measurement in between.

A complete response of the TMA was observed during the 26-week period for the first assessment in 14 of the 18 patients without previous treatment (77.8%), as shown in Table 21.

Table 21: Complete response of the TMA and analysis of the components of the complete response of the TMA during the 26-week period for the first assessment (ALXN1210-aHUS-312)

 

Total

Responders

n

Fraction (95% CI)a

Complete response of the TMA

18

14

0.778 (0.524; 0.936)

Components of the complete response of the TMA

 

 

 

Normalisation of the platelet count

18

17

0.944 (0.727; 0.999)

Normalisation of LDH

18

16

0.889 (0.653; 0.986)

≥25% improvement in the serum creatinine compared with baseline

18

15

0.833 (0.586; 0.964)

Normalisation of the blood values

18

16

0.889 (0.653; 0.986)

Note: 1 patient withdrew from the study after treatment with 2 doses of ravulizumab.

a The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the fraction were based on the asymptotic Gaussian approximation method with continuity correction.

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; TMA = thrombotic microangiopathy.

The complete response of the TMA during the period for the first assessment was achieved in a median time of 30 days (15 to 97 days). In all patients with a complete response of the TMA, the response was maintained throughout the period for the first assessment, with continuous improvements in kidney function being observed. After the start of the ravulizumab treatment, a rise in the mean platelet count was soon detectable, with an increase from 60.50 × 109/L at the start of the study to 296.67 × 109/L on day 8; it was above 296 × 109/L at all subsequent visits in the period for the first assessment (26 weeks).

Three further patients showed a complete response of the TMA, which was confirmed after the 26-week period for the first assessment (the complete response of the TMA was observed on days 291, 297 and 353). Thus, 17 of the 18 paediatric patients (94.4%) (95% CI: 72.7%; 99.9%) showed a complete response of the TMA. The response of individual components increased to 17 of 18 patients (94.4%; 95% CI: 72.7%, 99.9%) for the normalisation of the platelet count, to 17 of 18 patients (94.4%; 95% CI: 72.7%, 99.9%) for the normalisation of LDH, and to 17 of 18 patients (94.4%; 95% CI: 72.7%, 99.9%) for improvement in kidney function.

All 6 patients who were dialysis-dependent at enrolment in the study were able to discontinue the dialysis treatment. In five of these patients, this was possible on day 43 at the latest. No patient started dialysis treatment during the study. Most of the patient population (15/17) showed an improvement in the CKD of one or more stages by day 183; 14 patients showed an improvement of 2 or more stages. Table 22 summarises the secondary efficacy results for study ALXN1210-aHUS-312.

Table 22: Secondary efficacy results of study ALXN1210-aHUS-312

Parameter

Study ALXN1210-aHUS-312

(N = 18)

Haematological parameters in TMA, day 183

Platelet count (109/L)

     Mean (SD)

     Median

Serum LDH (U/L)

     Mean (SD)

     Median

Observed value

(n = 17)

 

304.94 (75.711)

318.00

 

262.41 (59.995)

247.00

Change from baseline (n = 17)

 

 

245.59 (91.827)

247.00

 

-2044.13 (1328.059)

-1851.50

≥20 g/L increase in haemoglobin from baseline with confirmed result during the period for the first assessment

m/N

Fraction (95% CI)*

 

 

 

 

16/18

0.889 (0.653; 0.986)

Change from baseline in CKD stage, day 183

 Improvementa

   m/n

   Fraction (95% CI)*

 Deteriorationb

   m/n

   Fraction (95% CI)*

 

 

 

15/17

0.882 (0.636; 0.985)

 

0/11

0.000 (0.000; 0.285)

eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), day 183

 

Mean (SD)

Median

Observed value (n = 17)

 

108.5 (56.87)

108.00

Change from baseline (n = 17)

 

85.4 (54.33)

80.00

Note: n: number of patients with available data for a defined examination at the visit on day 183. m: number of patients who meet a defined criterion. The stage of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) is determined using the chronic kidney disease stage classification of the National Kidney Foundation. Stage 1 is regarded as the best category, whereas stage 5 is the worst category. The baseline value is determined using the last available eGFR before the start of treatment. Improvement/deterioration: compared with the CKD stage at the start of the study.

*The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are based on the exact Clopper-Pearson confidence interval.

a Improvement excludes patients with stage 1 CKD at the start of the study, because no improvement is possible in them.

b Deterioration excludes patients with stage 5 at the start of the study, as no deterioration is possible in them.

Abbreviations: eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; TMA = thrombotic microangiopathy.

In patients who were previously treated with eculizumab, the switch to ravulizumab led to maintenance of control of the disease, as can be seen from the stable haematological and renal parameters, without any evident impact on safety.

The efficacy of ravulizumab in the treatment of aHUS seems to be similar in paediatric patients to that in adult patients.

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption

Because the route of ravulizumab administration is an intravenous infusion and the dosage form is a solution, the administered dose is considered 100% bioavailable. The time to maximum observed concentration (tmax) is expected by the end of infusion or soon thereafter. Therapeutic steady-state drug concentrations are reached after the first dose.

Distribution

The mean (standard deviation [SD]) central volume and volume of distribution at steady state for adult patients and paediatric patients with PNH and aHUS and in adult patients with gMG or NMOSD are presented in Table 23.

Metabolism

As an immunoglobulin gamma (IgG) monoclonal antibody, ravulizumab is expected to be metabolised in the same manner as any endogenous IgG (degraded into small peptides and amino acids via catabolic pathways), and is subject to similar elimination. Ravulizumab contains only naturally occurring amino acids and has no known active metabolites.

Elimination

The mean (SD) values for terminal elimination half-life and clearance of ravulizumab in adult and paediatric patients with PNH or aHUS and adult patients with gMG or NMOSD are presented in Table 23.

Table 23: Estimated central volume, distribution, biotransformation and elimination parameters following ravulizumab administration

 

Adult and paediatric patients with PNH

Adult and paediatric patients with aHUS

Adult patients with gMG

Adult patients with NMOSD

Estimated central volume (litres)
Mean (SD)

Adults: 3.44 (0.65)

Paediatric patients: 2.87 (0.60)

Adults: 3.25 (0.61)
Paediatric
patients: 1.14 (0.51)

3.42 (0.756)

2.91 (0.571)

Volume of distribution at steady state (litres)
Mean (SD)

5.30 (0.9)

5.22 (1.85)

5.74 (1.16)

4.77 (0.819)

Terminal elimination half-life (days)
Mean (SD)

49.6 (9.1)

51.8 (16.2)

56.6 (8.36)

64.3 (11.0)

Clearance (litres/day)
Mean (SD)

0.08 (0.022)

0.08 (0.04)

0.08 (0.02)

0.05 (0.016)

Abbreviations: aHUS = atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome; gMG = generalised myasthenia gravis;

NMOSD = neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; PNH = paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria; SD = standard deviation.

Linearity/non-linearity

Over the studied range of dosing and dosing regimens, ravulizumab exhibited dose-proportional and time-linear pharmacokinetics (PK).

Kinetics in specific patient groups

Body weight

Body weight is a significant co-variable in patients with PNH, aHUS, gMG or NMOSD, which leads to lower bioavailability in heavier patients. Weight-based dosing is given in the "Dosage/Administration" section, Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.

No formal study of the effect of sex, ethnic background, age (geriatric patients), hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of ravulizumab was conducted. However, based on a pharmacokinetic population analysis, no impact of sex, age, ethnic background and hepatic or renal function on the pharmacokinetics of ravulizumab was identified in the studied healthy volunteer subjects and patients with PNH, aHUS, gMG or NMOSD. As a result, no dose adjustment is considered necessary.

The pharmacokinetics of ravulizumab were investigated in aHUS patients with different degrees of renal impairment, including dialysis-dependent patients. In these patient subpopulations, including patients with proteinuria, no differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters were observed.

Preclinical data

Animal reproductive toxicology studies have not been conducted with ravulizumab, but were conducted in mice with a murine surrogate complement inhibitory antibody, BB5.1. No clear treatment-related effects or adverse effects were observed in the reproductive toxicology studies in mice using a murine surrogate antibody. When maternal exposure to the antibody occurred during organogenesis, two cases of retinal dysplasia and one case of umbilical hernia were observed among 230 offspring born to mothers exposed to the higher antibody dose (approximately times the maximum recommended human ravulizumab dose, based on a body weight comparison); however, the exposure did not increase foetal loss or neonatal death.

No animal studies have been conducted to evaluate the genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of ravulizumab.

Based on non-clinical studies in mice using the murine surrogate molecule BB5.1, the preclinical data reveal no special hazard for humans.

Other information

Incompatibilities

This medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products.

Dilution should be carried out using only sodium chloride mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection as diluent.

Shelf life

Do not use this medicine after the expiry date marked as "EXP" on the pack.

Shelf life after opening

Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL

After dilution, the medicinal product should be used immediately. However, chemical and physical stability of the diluted product have been demonstrated for up to 24 hours at 2–8°C and for up to hours at room temperature.

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL

After dilution, the medicinal product should be used immediately. However, chemical and physical stability of the diluted product have been demonstrated for up to 24 hours at 2–8°C and for up to hours at room temperature.

Special precautions for storage

Store in the refrigerator (2–8ºC).

Do not freeze.

Keep the container in the outer carton in order to protect the contents from light (and/or moisture).

Keep out of the reach of children.

For storage conditions after dilution of the medicinal product, see section "Shelf life after opening".

Instructions for handling

Each vial is intended for single use only.

Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL

Ultomiris must be diluted to a final concentration of 50 mg/mL.

The usual aseptic conditions must be observed.

Prepare Ultomiris as follows:

1. The number of vials to be diluted is determined based on the individual patient's weight and the prescribed dose, see "Dosage/Administration" section.

2. Prior to dilution, the solution in the vials should be visually inspected; the solution should be free of any particulate matter or precipitation. Do not use if there is evidence of particulate matter or precipitation.

3. The calculated volume of medicinal product is withdrawn from the appropriate number of vials and diluted in an infusion bag using sodium chloride mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection as diluent. Refer to the administration reference tables below. Mix the product carefully. Do not shake.

4. After dilution, the final concentration of the solution to be infused is 50 mg/mL.

5. The prepared solution should be administered immediately following preparation unless it is stored at 2–8°C. If stored at 2–8°C, allow the diluted solution to warm to room temperature prior to administration. Do not administer as an intravenous push or bolus injection. Refer to Table 4 and Table 5 for the minimum infusion duration. The infusion must be administered through a 0.µm filter.

6. If the medicinal product is not used immediately after dilution, storage times must not exceed 24 hours at 2–8 °C or hours at room temperature, taking into account the expected infusion duration.

Table 24: Loading dose administration reference table for Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL

Body weight (kg)a

Loading dose (mg)

Ultomiris volume (mL)

Volume of NaCl diluentb (mL)

Total volume (mL)

≥10 to <20

600

6

6

12

≥20 to <30

900

9

9

18

≥30 to <40

1200

12

12

24

≥40 to <60

2400

24

24

48

≥60 to <100

2700

27

27

54

≥100

3000

30

30

60

a Body weight at time of treatment.

b Ultomiris should only be diluted using sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection.

Table 25: Maintenance dose administration reference table for Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL

Body weight (kg)a

Maintenance dose (mg)

Ultomiris volume (mL)

Volume of NaCl diluentb (mL)

Total volume (mL)

≥10 to <20

600

6

6

12

≥20 to <30

2100

21

21

42

≥30 to <40

2700

27

27

54

≥40 to <60

3000

30

30

60

≥60 to <100

3300

33

33

66

≥100

3600

36

36

72

a Body weight at time of treatment.

b Ultomiris should only be diluted using sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection.

Table 26: Supplemental dose administration reference table for Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL and 1100 mg/11 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

Body weight range (kg)a

Supplemental dose (mg)

ULTOMIRIS

volume (mL)

Volume of NaCl diluentb (mL)

Total volume (mL)

≥40 to <60

 

600

6

6

12

1200

12

12

24

1500

15

15

30

≥60 to <100

600

6

6

12

1500

15

15

30

1800

18

18

36

≥100

600

6

6

12

1500

15

15

30

1800

18

18

36

a Body weight at time of treatment

b Ultomiris should be only diluted using sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection.

 

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL

Ultomiris must be diluted to a final concentration of mg/mL.

The usual aseptic conditions must be observed.

Prepare Ultomiris as follows:

1. The number of vials to be diluted is determined based on the individual patient's weight and the prescribed dose, see "Dosage/Administration" section.

2. Prior to dilution, the solution in the vials should be visually inspected; the solution should be free of any particulate matter or precipitation. Do not use if there is evidence of particulate matter or precipitation.

3. The calculated volume of medicinal product is withdrawn from the appropriate number of vials and diluted in an infusion bag using sodium chloride mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection as diluent. Refer to the administration reference tables below. Mix the product carefully. Do not shake.

4. After dilution, the final concentration of the solution to be infused is mg/mL.

5. The prepared solution should be administered immediately following preparation unless it is stored at 2–8°C. If stored at 2–8°C, allow the diluted solution to warm to room temperature prior to administration. Do not administer as an intravenous push or bolus injection. Refer to Table 6 and Table 7 for minimum infusion duration. Infusion must be administered through a 0.µm filter.

6. If the medicinal product is not used immediately after dilution, storage times must not exceed 24 hours at 2–8°C or hours at room temperature, taking into account the expected infusion duration.

Table 27: Loading dose administration reference table for Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL

Body weight (kg)a

Loading dose (mg)

Ultomiris volume (mL)

Volume of NaCl diluentb (mL)

Total volume (mL)

≥10 to <20

600

60

60

120

≥20 to <30

900

90

90

180

≥30 to <40

1200

120

120

240

≥40 to <60

2400

240

240

480

≥60 to <100

2700

270

270

540

≥100

3000

300

300

600

a Body weight at time of treatment.

b Ultomiris should only be diluted using sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection.

Table 28: Maintenance dose administration reference table for Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL

Body weight (kg)a

Maintenance dose (mg)

Ultomiris volume (mL)

Volume of NaCl diluentb (mL)

Total volume (mL)

≥10 to <20

600

60

60

120

≥20 to <30

2100

210

210

420

≥30 to <40

2700

270

270

540

≥40 to <60

3000

300

300

600

≥60 to <100

3300

330

330

660

≥100

3600

360

360

720

a Body weight at time of treatment.

b Ultomiris should only be diluted using sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection.

Table 29: Supplemental dose administration reference table for Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL concentrate for solution for infusion

Body weight range (kg)a

Supplemental dose (mg)

ULTOMIRIS

volume (mL)

Volume of NaCl diluentb (mL)

Total volume (mL)

≥40 to <60

 

600

60

60

120

1200

120

120

240

1500

150

150

300

≥60 to <100

600

60

60

120

1500

150

150

300

1800

180

180

360

≥100

600

60

60

120

1500

150

150

300

1800

180

180

360

a Body weight at time of treatment.

b Ultomiris should only be diluted using sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection.

Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with national requirements.

Authorisation number

67278 (Swissmedic)

Packs

Ultomiris 300 mg/3 mL (100 mg/mL) concentrate for solution for infusion

3 mL sterile concentrate in a type I glass vial contains 300 mg ravulizumab (A)

Ultomiris 1100 mg/11 mL (100 mg/mL) concentrate for solution for infusion

11 mL sterile concentrate in a type I glass vial contains 1100 mg ravulizumab (A)

Ultomiris 300 mg/30 mL (10 mg/mL) concentrate for solution for infusion

30 mL sterile concentrate in a type I glass vial contains 300 mg ravulizumab (A)

Marketing authorisation holder

Alexion Pharma GmbH

Neuhofstrasse 34,

6340 Baar

Switzerland

Date of revision of the text

April 2025